
Growth hormone & IGF-1
The clearest demonstrated effect of CJC-1295 is that it can raise growth hormone and IGF-1, two hormones closely linked with growth, recovery and body composition.
Explore the research →
CJC-1295 encourages the body to release more growth hormone, which explains the interest around recovery, sleep and body composition.
CJC-1295 is mainly talked about for recovery, muscle and body composition, and sleep because it can increase the body's own growth-hormone and IGF-1 levels. Those hormones play important roles in tissue repair, muscle maintenance and the way the body uses and stores energy. That connection is what makes CJC-1295 interesting — and why recovery, body composition and sleep have become the main areas people want to explore.

The clearest demonstrated effect of CJC-1295 is that it can raise growth hormone and IGF-1, two hormones closely linked with growth, recovery and body composition.
Explore the research →
Recovery and tissue repair are among the most common reasons people become interested in CJC-1295.
Explore the research →
Building or preserving lean mass while reducing body fat is another major part of the conversation around CJC-1295.
Explore the research →
Better sleep and a general improvement in wellbeing are also commonly reported reasons for interest.
Explore the research →CJC-1295 is based on growth-hormone-releasing hormone, or GHRH. It stimulates GHRH receptors on the pituitary, which can increase growth hormone and downstream IGF-1.
The DAC version binds to albumin, a blood protein, to prolong exposure. Products described as 'without DAC' are commonly a different, shorter-acting GHRH analogue, so their timing and trial evidence should be kept separate.
See the studies & trials →
Human hormone-response evidence does not establish every recovery or body-composition claim.
Read a primary source ↗These are the tissues and biological systems behind the interest in CJC-1295.

The clearest demonstrated effect of CJC-1295 is that it can raise growth hormone and IGF-1, two hormones closely linked with growth, recovery and body composition.
Early human studies showed measurable increases in circulating growth hormone and IGF-1 after administration.
Early human pharmacology evidenceExplore the studies →Recovery and tissue repair are among the most common reasons people become interested in CJC-1295.
There is a reasonable biological basis for this interest because of the growth-hormone response, but strong trials showing faster recovery with CJC-1295 itself are lacking.
Mechanistic rationaleExplore the studies →Building or preserving lean mass while reducing body fat is another major part of the conversation around CJC-1295.
Despite the interest, controlled studies have not yet established a meaningful body-composition benefit from CJC-1295 itself.
Insufficient outcome evidenceExplore the studies →Better sleep and a general improvement in wellbeing are also commonly reported reasons for interest.
These effects have not been established as reliable clinical benefits in the available human research.
Community interest · limited evidenceExplore the studies →Healthy adults aged 21–61 years
This score reflects completed human outcome evidence. A registered or recruiting trial does not count until results are reported.
These are editorial evidence-depth ratings on a 1–5 scale, not a statistical result or a single scientific formula. They summarise how much relevant evidence is present in each separate category and how mature that evidence is.
Research themes are shown separately from the strength of the human evidence so biological interest is not confused with proven clinical benefit.
CJC-1295 is explored around recovery, sleep and body composition because human studies show that it can raise growth hormone and IGF-1. The key practical issue is product identity: DAC-linked CJC-1295 and shorter-acting ‘no DAC’ products should not share one dosing conversation.
Explore the everyday goalsWhat the desired change means in daily life, and what makes an experience useful to understand.
People are interested in recovering between workouts and maintaining a consistent training week. The appeal comes from growth-hormone signalling, although a higher hormone measurement is not itself proof of better recovery.
Sleep-related interest focuses on waking refreshed and feeling less depleted the following day. It is a subjective goal that needs more detail than reporting unusually vivid dreams.
People hope for a leaner appearance while retaining muscle and training performance. Accounts need to separate changes in waist and strength from shifts in water retention.
Selected first-hand accounts illustrate the goals and the variation in experience. They are examples, not a representative sample or proof of an effect.
A participant reports better sleep alongside morning grogginess. Combination use and unclear CJC identity limit interpretation.
Read the discussionThis account describes daytime lethargy during combination use, a useful distinction between sleep impressions and next-day function.
Read the discussionOpen an area to distinguish human findings from laboratory explanations.
Short randomized studies in healthy adults showed prolonged, dose-related increases in GH and IGF-1.
The compound was designed to extend GHRH-like signalling through drug-affinity-complex technology.
What this means: A demonstrated pharmacology effect; it is not the same as proven recovery or body-composition benefit.
The early human programme measured hormones and pharmacokinetics rather than sleep quality, injury recovery or training outcomes.
Growth-hormone physiology offers a rationale, but the outcome still needs direct testing.
What this means: Plausible, popular and not yet established as a reliable clinical benefit.
The available human studies examined the compounds separately, not as a validated combined protocol.
GHRH and ghrelin-receptor pathways can produce complementary GH signals, but combination safety and outcomes remain uncertain.
What this means: A community rationale without direct human combination evidence.
See the amount, how often it was used and how long each study ran. Published human research and community descriptions each carry their own source label, so you can see where the numbers came from.
Early randomized human studies used weight-based subcutaneous dosing to study pharmacokinetics and GH/IGF-I responses; these protocols are research doses, not a general treatment schedule.
Healthy adults aged 21–61
This was a published human study. It involved Healthy adults aged 21–61. Route: Injection under the skin (SubQ). The study lasted about 4–7 weeks (28–49 days). The figures below describe the research design, not a personal schedule.
| First amount studied | 30–60 micrograms per kilogram of body weight across the dose levels researchers tested |
|---|---|
| Later or target amount | several increasing dose levels were tested in separate study groups |
| How often? | Single dose, then once a week or every 2 weeks in groups receiving repeat doses |
| How was it given? | Injection under the skin (SubQ) |
| How long? | About 4–7 weeks (28–49 days) |
Start / initial: 30–60 μg/kg among studied dose levels
End / target: Ascending single and repeat dose cohorts
Frequency: Single dose, then weekly or biweekly in repeat-dose cohorts
Route: Subcutaneous
Study duration: 28–49 days
Source: PMID 16352683 ↗
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic research protocol; not a recommendation.
For DAC-linked CJC-1295, community protocols often begin around 1 mg once weekly. This is anecdotal and is not the same product or schedule as ‘CJC-1295 without DAC’ / modified GRF 1-29.
Eight-to-twelve-week cycles are commonly discussed, with dose and frequency varying sharply according to whether DAC is present.
Some discussions use 1–2 mg weekly before a pause. No evidence-based maintenance dose, cycle length or break interval has been established.
Subcutaneous injection is the route most frequently discussed in community use.
Abdominal or other routine subcutaneous sites are commonly discussed. Site selection is generally treated as a practical injection choice rather than a way to target a specific tissue.
Evening or bedtime use, and use away from meals, are commonly discussed because of interest in growth-hormone pulses. These practices are not validated as superior clinical strategies.
Users often discuss multi-week or multi-month cycles, frequently alongside Ipamorelin, but there is no established community schedule that can be treated as clinical guidance.
CJC-1295 has some human pharmacology data, but popular recovery, sleep and body-composition protocols go beyond what those studies establish.
Community reports describe what people say they do; they are not instructions, validated protocols, or evidence that a particular injection site or timing improves outcomes.Convert amounts, concentration, liquid volume and vial requirements. These tools do the arithmetic; they do not select a dose.
Purity, identity, quantity, sterility and endotoxin testing answer different questions. Learn how to read a COA and why a high purity percentage is not the same as confirming the amount in the vial.
A dose only makes sense alongside the population, route, frequency and duration. Start with where the number came from, then look at how it was delivered and how long the study actually ran.
Was it an authorised label, a human trial or a community-described pattern?
How was it given, and how often? The same number by a different route may not mean the same exposure.
Was this one dose, a short trial or long-term treatment? A study window is not automatically a recommended cycle.
Route means how a compound was delivered. It affects absorption and can completely change how a study should be interpreted.
An injection into the fatty layer just under the skin.
Common in peptide and metabolic-drug studies. It usually aims for systemic absorption rather than treating only the spot injected.An injection into muscle tissue.
Muscle can absorb a medicine differently from fat. An IM amount should not be assumed to be equivalent to a SubQ amount.Delivered directly into a vein.
This gives immediate bloodstream exposure and is commonly used in supervised research or clinical settings. It is not interchangeable with a home injection route.Delivered through the nose rather than by injection.
The amount delivered depends on formulation and device. A spray count alone does not tell you the dose unless concentration and spray volume are known.This example is specifically for CJC-1295 with DAC. Without-DAC products, often described as modified GRF(1–29), are different. Human DAC studies used weight-based amounts; they do not establish this fixed 2 mg pattern.
Form and route: CJC-1295 with DAC · injection under the skin
| Calendar stage | Amount each time |
|---|---|
| Weeks 1–12 | 2 mg |
Frequency: Every 7 days · 1 entry per scheduled day.
This is a finite editorial example. Its ending does not establish a safe course, break or repeat cycle. No repeat is added automatically.
One thousand micrograms (mcg).
One thousandth of a milligram.
The amount is calculated for each kilogram of body weight.
A measure of biological activity used for some medicines; it cannot be converted to mg without compound-specific information.
For example SubQ, IM, IV, intranasal, oral or topical.
For example once daily, twice weekly or every seven days.
A protocol changes the amount over time rather than using one fixed amount throughout.
The time taken for the amount of a compound in the body to reduce by roughly half. It can influence study timing but does not by itself define a schedule.
Usually means an on-period followed by a stop or review. Many community 'cycles' have not been clinically validated.
A longer-term amount or interval used after an initial phase when a study or authorised treatment actually defines one.
Adding a specified liquid to a freeze-dried vial so a concentration can be calculated.
100 units equals 1 mL on a U-100 insulin syringe. The markings show volume, not peptide mass.
The summary above reflects the human or preclinical evidence currently represented on this profile.
Limited follow-up, small studies or absent controlled trials can leave uncommon and longer-term risks unresolved.
Route, product identity, quality and regulatory status can materially change the safety context; see the linked status sources below.
The label ‘CJC-1295’ is used inconsistently in the market. DAC-linked and non-DAC products differ materially in duration and should not be treated as interchangeable.
Follow the professional sources used across this profile, then see how the compound is currently described in regulatory and research terms.
Human studies established prolonged GH and IGF-1 responses, but not an authorised recovery, anti-ageing or body-composition indication.
CJC-1295 study · PubMed ↗Shorter-acting modified GRF products are often called ‘CJC-1295 without DAC’ in community use, but they are not pharmacokinetically equivalent to the DAC-linked compound studied in the cited trial.
Original pharmacology paper · DOI ↗Profile reviewed against its linked source record on 20 September 2026. See how evidence is assessed.
Save peptides, build plans, set reminders and keep track of your own supplies in a private My Explorer space.